APUSH
Mr. Decarlo
27 September 2012
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
LAD #7: Washington's Farewell Address
Tim Foster
APUSH
Mr. Decarlo
27 September 2012
In Washington's farewell speech, he expresses his concerns with the American people while also thanking them for their support of his views. Washington told the people that they are one body now held together by freedom. Washington also the attitudes of the people to be an obstacle in the welfare of the country. He said people should value national union above happiness because at this time pride in ones country, religious manners, and political principles were all being trumped by self interests of the individual. The people only thinking about themselves could jeopardize the power of the government and union of the nation Washington said. Additionally he wanted to caution people about international relationships and discouraged relationships with other countries. Regardless of the financial benefits he wanted Americans to stay neutral as best as possible.
APUSH
Mr. Decarlo
27 September 2012
LAD #6: Washington's Proclamation of Neutrality
Tim Foster
APUSH
Mr. Decarlo
27 September 2012
Washington's Proclamation of Neutrality declared the United States a neutral power in the War of First Coalition which was between France and Austria, Prussia, Sardinia, Great Britain, and United Netherlands. Washington warned the people of America that any citizen that decides to engage in hostility of the European nations at war will lose the U.S. protection and would face persecution and punishment.
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Republic Motherhood Blog
Tim Foster
APUSH
Mr. DeCarlo
26 September 2012
1. What role did the Revolutionary War play in the transformation of housewifery to republic motherhood? Before the Revolutionary War women really had no role in society and were just housewives. There only real responsibility was to God. Republican Motherhood gave them new duties and responsibilities. They were expected to nurse and educate the new generation of people and if a woman left her household she was deserting the station which God and nature assigned her (Doc A). Motherhood became more important than running the home.
2. What were the consequences of Republican Motherhood on women? It affected them positively and negatively. Negatively it limited them from being in many positions of work because their main priority was supposed to be home. Also if a child did not act as they should they blame was put on the mother (Doc D). On the positive side, They learned some geography and book keeping skills and were given knowledge on the english language to teach the next generation (Doc B). They were expected to train the generation to be good citizens (Doc A).
3. What is the significance of the ideology of Republican Motherhood as a stage in the process of women's socialization? Republican Motherhood was an advancement for women because they had more responsibilities than just the one with God even though that remained very important (Doc A). Additionally, the women were said to be brave Americans and always dear to America due to their service (Doc C). Another positive was the education given to this women during this time period. In document B Benjamin rush said that it was necessary for women to know the English language, how to write, how to read, geography, and even history. Lastly, women begin to think higher of themselves because they gained more responsibilities in the world and were very important in shaping the future generation (Doc C).
1. Describe the setting
Mary and her two sons are sitting, all smiling, on a couch or chair in their house in the family room or the living room.
2. Who serves at the center of the portrait and why? How does the women look? How is she a "republican" rather than aristocratic? The mother is the center of the portrait and showing she holds the most significance. She looks very comfortable and pleasant and I can tell she is a republican because she is not dressed up for the picture she looks casual. Also she is holding her children with pride and showing their importance to her.
3. What values do her sons exhibit? They look like proper young men and look well raised. Since their mom is a republican they are most likely well educated despite their young age. \
4. Is there a significance to the position of Mrs. Tilgham's arm? Her arm placement to me shows her protection and love for her children. She could also be signifying that she is holding the younger son because she does not want him to fall.
APUSH
Mr. DeCarlo
26 September 2012
1. What role did the Revolutionary War play in the transformation of housewifery to republic motherhood? Before the Revolutionary War women really had no role in society and were just housewives. There only real responsibility was to God. Republican Motherhood gave them new duties and responsibilities. They were expected to nurse and educate the new generation of people and if a woman left her household she was deserting the station which God and nature assigned her (Doc A). Motherhood became more important than running the home.
2. What were the consequences of Republican Motherhood on women? It affected them positively and negatively. Negatively it limited them from being in many positions of work because their main priority was supposed to be home. Also if a child did not act as they should they blame was put on the mother (Doc D). On the positive side, They learned some geography and book keeping skills and were given knowledge on the english language to teach the next generation (Doc B). They were expected to train the generation to be good citizens (Doc A).
3. What is the significance of the ideology of Republican Motherhood as a stage in the process of women's socialization? Republican Motherhood was an advancement for women because they had more responsibilities than just the one with God even though that remained very important (Doc A). Additionally, the women were said to be brave Americans and always dear to America due to their service (Doc C). Another positive was the education given to this women during this time period. In document B Benjamin rush said that it was necessary for women to know the English language, how to write, how to read, geography, and even history. Lastly, women begin to think higher of themselves because they gained more responsibilities in the world and were very important in shaping the future generation (Doc C).
Mary and her two sons are sitting, all smiling, on a couch or chair in their house in the family room or the living room.
2. Who serves at the center of the portrait and why? How does the women look? How is she a "republican" rather than aristocratic? The mother is the center of the portrait and showing she holds the most significance. She looks very comfortable and pleasant and I can tell she is a republican because she is not dressed up for the picture she looks casual. Also she is holding her children with pride and showing their importance to her.
3. What values do her sons exhibit? They look like proper young men and look well raised. Since their mom is a republican they are most likely well educated despite their young age. \
4. Is there a significance to the position of Mrs. Tilgham's arm? Her arm placement to me shows her protection and love for her children. She could also be signifying that she is holding the younger son because she does not want him to fall.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
LAD #5 The Federalist #10
Tim Foster
Ap US
24 September 2012
1. Why are factions so difficult to eliminate? Factions are difficult to eliminate because it would have to be accomplished by either taking away liberty of the people or making sure each citizen has the same opinions. Doing either of these things is very unrealistic which makes it harder to remove factions from the political world. taking away liberty from the people would be going against what the colonists fought for so many years and it is morally wrong. People will never have the same opinion on anything because no two people think or act the same way.
2. If factions cannot be removed how can they be controlled? Factions can be controlled by instituting a republic government and its principle that majority overrules minority. This type of government would alter the way representation takes place and would eliminate an abundance of various political parties and unworthy candidates. In America a republic would work better than a democracy because a democracy is better for controlling a smaller population of people and a republic can handle a large country like ours. Also a republic allows several factions to be represented through elected representatives where in a democracy each person represents themselves.
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Blog #4 - Revolution Article
5 Things I learned while reading.....
1. For every soldier in the Continental Army 1 in 4 died. It was 1 in 5 for soldiers that fought in the Civil War. During WWII 1 in 40 U.S. soldiers died.
2. While the military leaders of the Civil War are more famous, during the Revolutionary War the civilian leaders are given more credit than the military leaders.
3. The living conditions for soldiers were not just limited to the winter conditions of Valley Forge in 1776-1777, in fact they were much worse than living conditions during the Civil War.
4. John Adams was very jealous of Ben Franklin and George Washington and believed that the great epic of revolution, which he was a part of, would have a distorted history.
5. The American armies were desperate when it came to clothing. Many men walked through snow, rough terrain, and woods while fighting without shoes on. Frostbite and infections would happen very easily. Not only this, but soldiers were not fully clothed at times and were often considered “naked.” They were so desperate that they would steal the clothes off the back of captives, causing low probability of surviving in captivity.
1. For every soldier in the Continental Army 1 in 4 died. It was 1 in 5 for soldiers that fought in the Civil War. During WWII 1 in 40 U.S. soldiers died.
2. While the military leaders of the Civil War are more famous, during the Revolutionary War the civilian leaders are given more credit than the military leaders.
3. The living conditions for soldiers were not just limited to the winter conditions of Valley Forge in 1776-1777, in fact they were much worse than living conditions during the Civil War.
4. John Adams was very jealous of Ben Franklin and George Washington and believed that the great epic of revolution, which he was a part of, would have a distorted history.
5. The American armies were desperate when it came to clothing. Many men walked through snow, rough terrain, and woods while fighting without shoes on. Frostbite and infections would happen very easily. Not only this, but soldiers were not fully clothed at times and were often considered “naked.” They were so desperate that they would steal the clothes off the back of captives, causing low probability of surviving in captivity.
Monday, September 17, 2012
LAD Declaration of Independence
Summarize the Declaration of Independence in 3 parts (1. democratic principles, 2. a list of handful grievances, and 3. the conclusion).
1. There were numerous democratic principles included in the Declaration of Independence, one of which is that all men are created equal. Also that all men were born with natural rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. These rights would be secured by the government, which can be created and altered by the people. If there is corruption in the government, it's the people's right and duty to abolish it.
2. The colonists had many grievances against the King of Britain. Some of those were The King would not enforce some laws in the colonies and would ignore all well being of the general public. Additionally, The King would limit the trade of the colonies so it would only benefit Britain. Taxation without representation was another big grievance because the colonies thought they should have some consent on the tax process. King George also took away colonial charters and changed colonial government laws.
3. The colonists were sick and tired of living under British rule. Every time the colonists petitioned to try and address simple matters, they were answered with injury. The declaration was the final petition marking the end of Britain rule in the colonies. The Colonies declared they are free and independent with all power any normal country would have.
1. There were numerous democratic principles included in the Declaration of Independence, one of which is that all men are created equal. Also that all men were born with natural rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. These rights would be secured by the government, which can be created and altered by the people. If there is corruption in the government, it's the people's right and duty to abolish it.
2. The colonists had many grievances against the King of Britain. Some of those were The King would not enforce some laws in the colonies and would ignore all well being of the general public. Additionally, The King would limit the trade of the colonies so it would only benefit Britain. Taxation without representation was another big grievance because the colonies thought they should have some consent on the tax process. King George also took away colonial charters and changed colonial government laws.
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Peter Zenger Questions
Peter Zenger Questions
1. Who was John Peter Zenger? John Peter Zenger was a printer, publisher, and editor of the New York Gazette who spoke out to the onerous polices of colonial governor William Cosby who was newly appointed. Cosby then charged Zenger with seditious libel and was put in jail eight months awaiting his trial.
2.What was the controversy over his charges? Talk about Hamilton's defense. The controversy was all the people that hear about this case were on his side and in fact believed his accusations were not slanderous but they were true. Hamilton's defense argued that if what Zenger was saying was true that it would not be libelous because he is just saying what is what.
3.What influence did his case have on American governmental tradition? It changed the way the court looked at libel suits. After this case anything that people were saying, no matter how bad it is, was not considered libelous.
4. What is the lasting significance of his trial? Explain. This trial was the groundwork for the advancements towards freedom of the press. After this, Newspapers could print articles criticizing anything they wanted as long as they were true.
1. Who was John Peter Zenger? John Peter Zenger was a printer, publisher, and editor of the New York Gazette who spoke out to the onerous polices of colonial governor William Cosby who was newly appointed. Cosby then charged Zenger with seditious libel and was put in jail eight months awaiting his trial.
2.What was the controversy over his charges? Talk about Hamilton's defense. The controversy was all the people that hear about this case were on his side and in fact believed his accusations were not slanderous but they were true. Hamilton's defense argued that if what Zenger was saying was true that it would not be libelous because he is just saying what is what.
3.What influence did his case have on American governmental tradition? It changed the way the court looked at libel suits. After this case anything that people were saying, no matter how bad it is, was not considered libelous.
4. What is the lasting significance of his trial? Explain. This trial was the groundwork for the advancements towards freedom of the press. After this, Newspapers could print articles criticizing anything they wanted as long as they were true.
LAD #1 Mayflower Compact & Fundamental Orders of Connecticut
LAD #1 Mayflower Compact & Fundamental Orders of Connecticut
1. What concepts are included in the Mayflower Compact? Some concepts included in the Mayflower Compact was it was a promising step towards self-government and the concept of majority rule during open-discussion town meetings was established.
2.How does the Mayflower Compact reflect and attachment to both the "Old" and "New" worlds? The Mayflower Compact reflects an attachment to the "Old world" such as governmental ideas branching off of Britain "Old world" laws. The attachment to the "New world" is democratic ideas set up buy the Pilgrims' for example, forming their own local government and holding town meetings.
3.How did the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut differ from the Mayflower Compact?
The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut differ from the Mayflower Compact in that the Mayflower Compact was not going to be permanent but just a form or government to keep the Pilgrims in line and keep them from not following the laws they set up. The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut was a permanent government which would involve the people, set up precedents for the future, and display what power the government and the positions in government would have.
4.What prompted the colonists of Connecticut to take this approach to government, i.e.: use of a written Constitution? What prompted the colonists of Connecticut to use a written constitution was they wanted a strong, unified government. They wanted a democratic form of government where the people chose who they want to lead them and they wanted a written set of laws. These laws also helped Connecticut become more independent from Britain.
5. In what significant way(s) does the Fundamental Orders reflect a fear of and safeguard against the usurping of power by one person or a chosen few? With the fear that one person would contain all the power in government the Fundamental Orders set up a democratic government so they people could choose who they want to lead them. Also the Fundamental Orders limited the powers of the leaders of the government in order for them not to control complete power.
1. What concepts are included in the Mayflower Compact? Some concepts included in the Mayflower Compact was it was a promising step towards self-government and the concept of majority rule during open-discussion town meetings was established.
2.How does the Mayflower Compact reflect and attachment to both the "Old" and "New" worlds? The Mayflower Compact reflects an attachment to the "Old world" such as governmental ideas branching off of Britain "Old world" laws. The attachment to the "New world" is democratic ideas set up buy the Pilgrims' for example, forming their own local government and holding town meetings.
3.How did the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut differ from the Mayflower Compact?
The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut differ from the Mayflower Compact in that the Mayflower Compact was not going to be permanent but just a form or government to keep the Pilgrims in line and keep them from not following the laws they set up. The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut was a permanent government which would involve the people, set up precedents for the future, and display what power the government and the positions in government would have.
4.What prompted the colonists of Connecticut to take this approach to government, i.e.: use of a written Constitution? What prompted the colonists of Connecticut to use a written constitution was they wanted a strong, unified government. They wanted a democratic form of government where the people chose who they want to lead them and they wanted a written set of laws. These laws also helped Connecticut become more independent from Britain.
5. In what significant way(s) does the Fundamental Orders reflect a fear of and safeguard against the usurping of power by one person or a chosen few? With the fear that one person would contain all the power in government the Fundamental Orders set up a democratic government so they people could choose who they want to lead them. Also the Fundamental Orders limited the powers of the leaders of the government in order for them not to control complete power.
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)